By Rev. James A. MacCaffrey.
The Netherlands formed part of the vast territories ruled over by Charles V. For
many reasons it was not to be wondered at that the people should sympathize with
the great religious revolt in Germany. They were allied closely with the Germans
by blood and language. Like them, too, they looked upon Spain and upon the
Spaniards with feelings of distrust. Again, as in other parts of the world, so
too in the Netherlands the wealth of the Church had led to grave abuses as well
as to a loss of respect for ecclesiastical authority, the latter of which was
fostered in the minds of some by the spirit of mysticism that flourished in the
land of St. Thomas a Kempis.
Yet, notwithstanding these favorable circumstances, the Reformation made little
progress in the Netherlands during the reign of Charles V. He was a man who
understood the people and who respected their rights and privileges. He visited
the country frequently, was always ready to listen to their demands, and he took
care not to offend their national instincts by a display of Spanish troops or
Spanish officials. Besides, having a freer hand to deal with the new religious
movement in the Netherlands than he had in Germany, he was determined to
preserve his hereditary dominions from the dimensions and civil strife that had
done so much to weaken the empire. He insisted on the proclamation and execution
of the decree of the Diet of Worms against Luther, forbade the spread of
heretical writings, introduced the Inquisition, and punished with great severity
those who were found guilty of attempting to tamper with the faith of the
people. But despite his efforts the trouble that had broken out in the
neighboring countries, France and Germany, could not fail to find an echo in the
Netherlands, and the views of Calvin and Luther found some support.
In 1555 Charles retired and was succeeded by his son Philip II. (1555-98). The
new ruler unlike his father made no effort to win the affections of his subjects
in the Netherlands, or to attach them to himself by bonds of loyalty. On the
contrary he came amongst them only too seldom, and after 1559 he never set foot
in the country. He showed himself careless about their commercial interests,
regardless of their constitutional rights and privileges, and indifferent to
their national prepossessions. Instead of relying on the native officials and
nobles to carry on the administration of the kingdom, he sought to strengthen
his own power by appointing Spaniards to offices of trust and by sending Spanish
troops to suppress all symptoms of discontent. He set aside the Grand Council
which by custom had the rights of a parliament, and without consultation with
the authorities in the Netherlands he decided upon a new ecclesiastical division
of the country. Hitherto there were only four bishops, whose Sees were subject
to foreign metropolitans. Philip decided that the time had come when the number
of bishoprics should be increased, and the jurisdiction of foreign metropolitans
should be abolished. The main reason that influenced him to adopt this decision
was the fact that, as matters stood, a complete and far-reaching scheme of
reform could not be put into operation. In conjunction with Pope Paul IV. he
arranged (1559) that the Spanish Netherlands should be placed under the three
newly-erected archiepiscopal Sees of Utrecht, Cambrai, and Mechlin, and that
suitable provision should be made for the maintenance of the new bishops out of
the possessions of the monasteries and of the ecclesiastical institutions as
well as from the contributions of the laity.
Many of the nobles were already tired of the Spanish rule, and were not
unwilling to look favorably on the religious struggle as a means of securing
independence. They objected to several unconstitutional acts of which the
government of Philip II. had been guilty. They disliked Cardinal de Granvelle,
the prime minister in the Netherlands, and insisted on his recall. They objected
to the introduction of the Inquisition, and they protested against the new
diocesan division as unnecessary, burdensome to the country, and an infringement
of the rights and privileges of certain individuals. The clergy and people,
whose positions were affected by the new arrangement, supported them strongly in
their opposition to this measure. The leaders of this movement were the Count of
Egmont and William of Orange, the latter of whom was a clever politician of
boundless ambitions, who was not without hope that a rebellion against Spain
might be the means of securing supreme power in the Netherlands. His brother,
the Prince of Nassau, had adopted Calvinism, and William himself was not
troubled with any particularly strong religious convictions. By his marriage
with the daughter of Maurice of Saxony he sought to assure himself of the
support of the German Protestant princes, while at the same time he was
intimately connected with the Huguenots of France, and was on terms of the
closest friendship with Counts Egmont and Horn, both of them, though for
different reasons, hostile to Philip II. For William and for many of his
abettors religion was but a secondary issue, provided only that by means of a
religious revolution the power of Spain could be overthrown. Cardinal Granvelle,
the minister of the Duchess of Parma, who was then regent of the country, was a
strong man and a dangerous opponent, for whose removal the party of William of
Orange strove with all their might. They succeeded at last in 1564, but despite
all their efforts they could not prevent the publication of the decrees of the
Council of Trent. They met together in the following year (1565) and formed the
union known as the Compromise of Breda, nominally for the preservation of their
constitutional rights but in reality to promote a political and religious
rebellion. Many earnest Catholics unaware of the motives that inspired the
leaders of this movement lent them their support. Having strengthened themselves
by negotiations with some of the Protestant princes of Germany, the
revolutionary party presented themselves before Margaret of Parma at Brussels to
demand redress (1566). During the course of the interview Count de Berlaymont
referred to them as a crowd of "gueux" or beggars, and this was the name they
adopted to designate their party (Les Gueux).
Though they professed themselves willing to maintain the Catholic religion the
friends of William of Orange had strong leanings towards Protestantism.
Calvinist preachers flocked in from France; Calvinist communities began to be
formed; and in districts where the party found itself powerful enough to do so,
attacks were made on Catholic churches and Catholic worship. These outrages
served to indicate the real tendency of the movement, and to drive into the
opposite camp many Catholics who had joined the party merely to secure redress
of political grievances. The Duchess of Parma, having failed to put an end to
the disturbances by friendly negotiations, determined to employ force against
the rebels. She was completely successful. William of Orange fled to Germany,
and Counts Egmont and Horn surrendered themselves to the mercy of the king
(1567). Had Philip II. known how to take advantage of this victory he might have
put an end to Calvinism in the Netherlands, for as yet the vast majority of the
inhabitants were at heart loyal to the Catholic church.
But instead of coming to make a personal appeal for the allegiance of his
subjects and of trying to win over the malcontents by a policy of moderation
Philip II., more concerned for the suppression of heresy than for the
maintenance of Spanish rule, sent the Duke of Alva (1567-72) with an army of ten
thousand men to punish the offenders and to wipe out all traces of Calvinism.
Alva was a soldier who had distinguished himself on many a field against the
Turks and against France. His character is sufficiently indicated by the title
"the iron duke" given him by those who knew him best. He had no faith in
diplomacy or concession. For him martial law was the only means of reducing
rebels to subjection. The Duchess of Parma, unwilling to share the
responsibility of government with such an associate, petitioned for her recall,
and the Duke of Alva was appointed regent of the Netherlands. Two leaders of the
rebellion, Counts Egmont and Horn, were tried and put to death (1568), as were
also many of their followers. The goods of the rebels were confiscated, soldiers
were quartered on the districts which were supposed to be sympathetic with the
movement, and martial law became the order of the day. But the cruel measures
adopted by the Duke of Alva did not put an end to the rebellion in the
Netherlands. On the contrary, the contempt shown by him for the constitution of
the country and the rights of individual citizens, the excessive taxation, and
the license given to the soldiers in their treatment of civilians served only to
embitter the issue and to drive even moderate men into the path of rebellion.
William of Orange, backed by his brother, Louis of Nassau, made descents upon
the country, while vessels manned by their supporters set themselves to do as
much harm as possible to Spanish trade. With the aid of England they managed to
capture the city and port of Briel (1572) Several of the northern states
threw off the yoke of Spain and acknowledged William of Orange as their ruler,
so that in a short time the Provinces of Holland and Zeeland were practically
lost to Philip II. William of Orange tried to obscure the religious nature of
the campaign by proclaiming religious freedom, but his followers could not be
restrained. The Catholic churches were attacked, the clergy were expelled, and
in 1572 nineteen priests were martyred for the faith at Gorcum. Holland and
Zeeland went over completely to Calvinism, nor were the southern provinces,
which were still Catholic, contented with the rule of Alva. Driven to
desperation by his taxation and unconstitutional policy they formed a league
with the followers of William of Orange to put an end to Spanish rule in the
Netherlands. Philip II. began to realize that he had been unfortunate in his
selection of a governor. A deputation that was sent from the insurgents was
received kindly, and Alva's resignation of his office was accepted.
In his place Don Louis Requesens was sent as governor of the Netherlands
(1573-5). Though inferior to Alva in military skill he was much superior to him
in the arts of diplomacy and conciliation. He withdrew promptly the financial
decrees that had caused such general discontent, yielded to most of the demands
made by the people, and offered a general amnesty to those who would return to
their allegiance. It required all the skill of William of Orange to prevent the
submission of his adherents. Disappointed by the removal of the grievances that
had provoked a national uprising, he was forced to have recourse more and more
to the religious issues in order to maintain his power. He proclaimed himself
the protector and champion of Calvinism, and as such he could still count on the
aid of the northern provinces. Unfortunately, too, at the very time when the
success of his policy of mildness seemed assured, Requesens died leaving it to
his successor to complete his work.
Don Juan of Austria, the natural son of Charles V., who had won renown
throughout the world by his annihilation of the Turkish fleet at Lepanto, was
appointed in his place. Before his arrival the southern and northern provinces
had bound themselves together in the Pacification of Ghent (1576). Don Juan was
obliged to accept the terms of the Pacification and to dismiss the Spanish
troops before his authority would be recognized. William of Orange, secure in
the north, determined to occupy the southern provinces, but his public
profession of Calvinism and the religious intolerance of his followers prevented
a combined national effort. The Catholic nobles of the Walloon provinces
objected to the Protestant campaign that was being carried on in the name of
liberty, and showed themselves not unwilling to come to terms with Don Juan. The
latter, only too glad to meet them half-way, issued a very conciliatory decree
(1577), which secured him the support of many of the Catholic party, and partly
by force, partly by negotiation he succeeded in winning back much of what had
been lost.
On the death of Don Juan (1578) Alexander Farnese, son of the former regent
Margaret of Parma, was appointed his successor. Being something of a statesman
as well as a soldier he lost no opportunity of endeavoring to break the power of
the Prince of Orange. He devoted a great deal of his energies to the work of
detaching the southern provinces, which still remained Catholic, from the
northern, which had gone over to Calvinism. The intolerance of the Calvinists
and their open violation of the religious freedom guaranteed to all parties
tended to the success of his plans. During his term of office Belgium returned
its allegiance to Spain, and this step put an end to the hopes entertained by
the Calvinists of winning that country to their side. Meanwhile the northern
provinces were entirely in the hands of William of Orange. In 1579 the five
provinces Holland, Zeeland, Friesland, Geldern, and Zutphen bound themselves
together by a solemn compact in the Union of Utrecht under the name of the
United Provinces, and practically speaking established a Dutch republic. They
agreed to make common cause in war and in peace, and appointed William of Orange
as Stadtholder for life. A short time later (1581) William of Orange,
notwithstanding all his proclamations regarding religious liberty, forbade the
public exercise of the Catholic religion, and refused to allow the new
Archbishop of Utrecht to take possession of his See. In these circumstances
nothing remained for the Pope except to appoint a vicar-apostolic to take charge
of the religious interests of the Catholics, who formed two-fifths of the
population of Holland, but even the vicar-apostolic was soon banished from the
country.
In 1584 William of Orange was assassinated, and his son Maurice was appointed to
succeed him. The English Government anxious to strike a blow at Spain encouraged
the Dutch to continue the war, and dispatched troops to their assistance. After
the defeat of the Spanish Armada the situation was much more favorable to the
rebels, and at last in 1609 a twelve years' truce was concluded. On the
expiration of the truce the war was renewed without any very striking success on
either side. Finally in the Peace of Westphalia (1648) the independence of the
Dutch republic was acknowledged by Spain. From the very beginning of the
religious revolt in the Netherlands Calvinism was the sect most favored by the
people, as is evidenced by the Confessio Belgica in 1562. The University
of Leyden decided in its favor, as did also the Synods of Dordrecht in 1574 and
1618. The Catholic minority in Holland were treated with the greatest severity,
but in spite of all the efforts to induce them to change their faith many of the
districts remained completely Catholic.
The Catholic provinces, which remained true to Spain and to the Catholic Church,
suffered very severely from the long-drawn-out struggle, but despite the ravages
of war they were soon the centre of a great religious, literary and artistic
revival. The University of Louvain, founded in 1425, developed rapidly under the
generous patronage of the civil rulers. During the sixteenth century it was
recognized as an important centre of learning whither scholars flocked not
merely from the Low Countries but from all parts of Europe. Throughout the
Reformation struggle Louvain and Douay, the latter of which was founded in 1562
by Philip II. to assist in stemming the rising tide of Calvinism, remained
staunch defenders of Catholic orthodoxy, though the unfortunate controversies
waged round the doctrines of Baius and Jansenius did something to dim the glory
of the university to which both belonged. The Jesuits, too, rendered invaluable
service to religion and learning, particularly the men who hastened to offer
their services to Father van Bolland in his famous Acta Sanctorum. Nor
can it be forgotten that it was in these days Catholic Belgium gave to the world
the great Flemish school of artists, amongst whom must be reckoned such men as
Rubens, Van Dyck, and Jordaens.
Copyright © World Spirituality · All Rights Reserved